The newly formed Global AI Governance Commission apparently has proposed (although I can't find it on their excellent and highly organized website) that AI decisions must be subject to regulations providing that they are trackable back to a human being. Quaere how this would work in terms of how this would be documented or implemented in terms of… Continue reading Ghost in the machine
Your turbo boost is going to work just fine.
Much ink is being spilled these days over the where the liability lies when an autonomously piloted car has an accident. I don't really understand the fuss here. Vehicles are made of components of which artificial intelligence may be one. If a component of a vehicle fails and causes an accident no doubt the vehicle… Continue reading Your turbo boost is going to work just fine.
I guess they didn’t think of that.
My previous post about the potentiality of a conflict of laws between nation states because of how they might differently regulate or deal with artificial intelligence has an analgous consideration inside of Canada. A quick primer on the federal and provicial legislative spheres in Canada: The Constitution Act, 1867 sets out whether the federal government or the… Continue reading I guess they didn’t think of that.
I, Robot (sometimes)
Here's a light read from India that blows right by the lack of a legal defintion of AI (It's nice when you're right), and asks the question can a robot be a legal person? And then worries that this will open up a Pandora's Box of legal issues within the country. Let's assume that a state somewhere… Continue reading I, Robot (sometimes)
“We call them Neanderoids”
So now we're putting neanderthal brains in crab robots. Because reasons. I think that at this point it's pretty clear that the answer to the question that this blog poses, is the law going to be ready for artificial intelligence, is nope, not a chance, that ship has sailed.
Viene la tormenta! 