financial services, Regulating AI, World Economic Forun

The gravity of the situation.

woman doing anti gravity yoga

The World Economic Forum (those are the fancy-Davos-meeting guys) published a report entitled The New Physics of Financial Services a few days ago which looks in depth at how AI will transform the financial services sector.

Their report uses a photo of the “Pillars of Creation” from the Eagle Nebula on the cover. I had to look it up. Apparently whatever that is may have already been destroyed by a supernova (bit ominous) so I think they should have gone with the photo above instead; particularly since the report is about how AI will turn the financial sector on its head. Their analogy is that “AI is changing the physics of finanical services…weakening the bonds that have historically held together financial institutions, while creating new centres of gravity where new and old capabilities are being combined in unexpected ways.” The photo I picked totally would have worked and it’s way more eyecatching.

Along with talking about how things-are-gonna-change-around-here, the report also addresses a number of things around the regulation of AI in the financial services sector. A stated goal of the report is to help regulators understand the challenges they face and necessary responses for both consumers and industry. The observations made and questions raised on that front include:

–there’s no working definition of AI, which leads to confusion and disagreement. (This may sound familiar if you have been to this blog before);

–data regulators that govern privacy and portability of data will affect the ability of institutions to deploy AI, thus becoming as important as current financial regulators;

–current regulatory burdens are a heavy strain on financial institutions and AI may help address that through AI that performs regulatory compliance;

–if regulatory compliance becomes collectively centralized through AI, financial institutions will want to avoid accountability for that centralized performance which will create a tension with regulators who want to hold financial institutions accountable;

–cross-border differences in financial and data regulations will require solutions, will that be effected?

–data regulations will affect how institutions enter into partnerships (and data partnerships will be required. Will regulators treat tech companies and financial institutions the same in terms of data-sharing standards?

–global data regulations are currently in an unprecedented period of change as governments seek to protect citizens and the new rules are not the same and the approach is not the same across the globe;

–data regulation will become the critical driver in determining the roles and positioning of players in financial services. Financial services incumbents will be affected by whether or not regulations allow them to access customer data;

–data sharing means monitoring and auditing by regulators becomes more complex. As risk of improper data sharing and breaches rise, regulatory oversight of data management will have to increase;

–the current regulator talent gap in this field is larger than that experienced by private institutions and this is a challenge to regulators;

–current regulations may be too complex, uncertain in allocating liability, fragmented, aimed at risk avoidance and require audits (which may be difficult in AI systems). These are roadblocks to implementation of AI;

–regulators need to address new trends and protect customers but leave room for innovation;

–“black letter” regulations are needed to ensure clarity so that participants in the financial system know how to comply with regulations. The general principles of consumer financial protection and fairness currently in the regulatory system are sound and do not need to be changed;

–cross border coordination is made worse by regional differences in regulation. (I note this point is very similar to some of the US Treasury report’s conclusions).

Good observations. The rest of the report (indeed most of it) refers to the effects of AI on the financial system. It’s thoughtful and has the input of many participants. Still should have gone with the photo I picked though.

 

 

 

 

Photo by Loe Moshkovska on Pexels.com

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s